Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

proper officer to sign statement u/s 11A (7)(i)

Vinay Mishra

In case initial SCN Signed and issued by Comm./ Addl. Comm., who is authorised to sign subsequent recurring Statement containing figures accounts for subsequent period in terms of new section 11 A (7) (i) of CEA, 1944, whether it is again according to monitory limit or the jurisdictional Superintendent may sign the same irrespective of amount of duty involved.  please submit your valued opinion.

 

Authority to Sign Recurring Statements Under Section 11A(7)(i) of Central Excise Act Clarified: Monetary Limits Apply A query was raised regarding the appropriate authority to sign a recurring statement under Section 11A(7)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, when the initial Show Cause Notice (SCN) was signed by the Commissioner or Additional Commissioner. The question was whether the jurisdictional Superintendent could sign the statement regardless of the duty amount involved. The response clarified that such statements must be issued according to the prescribed monetary limits, similar to the requirements for issuing a Show Cause-Cum-Demand notice. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
shamanthaka mani on Jun 28, 2013

Since the subsequent recurring statement contaning figures accoutns for subsequent period demands in terms of new Section 11A(7)(i) of CEA, 1944 are lieu of the Show Cause-Cum-Demand notice required to be isssued, such statements will necessarily have to be issued as per the monitary limits prescribed.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues