Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Income Tax Commissioners Must Personally Sign and Scrutinize Replies to Parliament Questions to Ensure Accuracy and Relevance.</h1> Commissioners of Income Tax (CITs) are instructed to personally sign and scrutinize replies to Parliament questions to ensure accuracy, completeness, and relevance. This directive follows an incident where an incomplete report was forwarded without proper examination, causing embarrassment to the Board. The Board emphasizes that replies should be verified by senior officers, and if a CIT is unavailable, the Income Tax Officer (Headquarters) must verify the response. If a CIT has previously approved a reply but is absent during dispatch, this must be noted. All Commissioners are required to adhere strictly to these instructions.