Reference filing threshold for adverse ITAT orders clarified; fresh references not required unless tax effect exceeds departmental threshold. The Board directs that the standard deduction under section 16(1) be allowed to pensioners from assessment year 1981-82; in consequence, existing practice on filing references is adjusted. A High Court decision showing divergent views has been referred to the Chief Justice. Departments should contest pending appeals, circulate the judgment to AACs, CIT(Appeals) and senior D.R.s, and dispose of appeals previously kept blocked. Fresh references against adverse Tribunal orders need not be filed except where the tax effect exceeds the Board's specified monetary threshold.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Reference filing threshold for adverse ITAT orders clarified; fresh references not required unless tax effect exceeds departmental threshold.
The Board directs that the standard deduction under section 16(1) be allowed to pensioners from assessment year 1981-82; in consequence, existing practice on filing references is adjusted. A High Court decision showing divergent views has been referred to the Chief Justice. Departments should contest pending appeals, circulate the judgment to AACs, CIT(Appeals) and senior D.R.s, and dispose of appeals previously kept blocked. Fresh references against adverse Tribunal orders need not be filed except where the tax effect exceeds the Board's specified monetary threshold.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.