Reduction of Government Litigation — fixing monetary limits for filing appeals or applications by the Department before GSTAT, High Courts and Supreme Court
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Monetary limits for appeals reduce government litigation; appeals below thresholds generally not filed, with specific exclusions. The Board prescribes monetary thresholds under the CGST Act below which Central tax officers shall not file appeals before GSTAT, High Courts or the Supreme Court, with specified rules for calculating the disputed amount (tax, interest, penalty, late fee, and refunds) and aggregation across composite orders. Exclusions require appeals to be decided on merits irrespective of thresholds, and non-filing under the thresholds must be recorded as not creating precedent or departmental acquiescence; officers may file appeals in other cases where amounts or questions of law warrant contestation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Monetary limits for appeals reduce government litigation; appeals below thresholds generally not filed, with specific exclusions.
The Board prescribes monetary thresholds under the CGST Act below which Central tax officers shall not file appeals before GSTAT, High Courts or the Supreme Court, with specified rules for calculating the disputed amount (tax, interest, penalty, late fee, and refunds) and aggregation across composite orders. Exclusions require appeals to be decided on merits irrespective of thresholds, and non-filing under the thresholds must be recorded as not creating precedent or departmental acquiescence; officers may file appeals in other cases where amounts or questions of law warrant contestation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.