Clarification regarding taxability of services provided by an office of an organisation in one State to the office of that organisation in another State, both being distinct persons
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Inter-state service taxation between distinct persons: choice of invoice or ISD determines input tax credit distribution and valuation. Where a head office procures common input services from a third party attributable to both head and branch offices, the head office may either distribute ITC via the ISD mechanism (subject to mandatory ISD registration and attribution to the recipient) or issue tax invoices to branch offices so they may claim ITC. For internally generated services, if the recipient is eligible for full ITC the invoice value declared by the supplier is deemed to be the open market value regardless of whether specific cost components like employee salary are included; omission of salary cost is not fatal, and where full ITC exists a nil invoice may be deemed open market value. If full ITC is not available to the recipient, inclusion of HO employee salary cost in taxable value is not mandatory.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Inter-state service taxation between distinct persons: choice of invoice or ISD determines input tax credit distribution and valuation.
Where a head office procures common input services from a third party attributable to both head and branch offices, the head office may either distribute ITC via the ISD mechanism (subject to mandatory ISD registration and attribution to the recipient) or issue tax invoices to branch offices so they may claim ITC. For internally generated services, if the recipient is eligible for full ITC the invoice value declared by the supplier is deemed to be the open market value regardless of whether specific cost components like employee salary are included; omission of salary cost is not fatal, and where full ITC exists a nil invoice may be deemed open market value. If full ITC is not available to the recipient, inclusion of HO employee salary cost in taxable value is not mandatory.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.