Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Delhi Tax Department Proposes Additional Security for New Dealers to Curb Fraudulent Refund Claims Under DVAT Act, 2004.</h1> The Department of Trade and Taxes in Delhi has identified numerous dealers exploiting provisions of the DVAT Act, 2004, by claiming unwarranted refunds or providing fictitious Input Tax Credit, causing significant revenue loss. Many of these dealers are newly registered and quickly disappear. To combat this, the department plans to require additional security from dealers registered within the last three years whose quantified turnover exceeds Rs. 10 crores and who have deposited less than 0.1% of this turnover in tax. Stakeholders are invited to provide feedback on this proposal by August 31, 2015.