Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Delhi High Court mandates Income Tax Department to follow Section 245 for refund adjustments, ensuring taxpayer notification and response.</h1> Under the directives of the Delhi High Court, the Income Tax Department must adhere to Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before adjusting any refunds against outstanding tax liabilities. This involves notifying the taxpayer and allowing them to respond, with the Assessing Officer reviewing the response before any adjustments are made. The Centralized Processing Center (CPC) in Bengaluru will process the refunds based on these findings. A detailed list of high refund cases with outstanding demands, categorized by region, has been compiled, with a total of 1,275 cases noted. Communication with the CPC should be conducted via the specified email.