Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Allahabad High Court's 'Net Wealth' Ruling Stands; Conflicts with Madras Court, Potential Supreme Court Appeal Looms.</h1> The circular addresses the binding nature of the Allahabad High Court's decision regarding the interpretation of 'net wealth' under Rule 2 of the Wealth-tax Rules, which should align with commercial principles rather than the definition in section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act. The application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected, making the decision binding in Lucknow and Kanpur. However, for assessments from 1968-69 onwards, Rule 1A may alter its applicability. The circular suggests pursuing further legal action to reconsider the decision in light of a conflicting Madras High Court ruling, potentially escalating the matter to the Supreme Court.