Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in winding-up proceedings, a creditor with mutual dealings with the company is entitled to have the respective amounts set off under the insolvency rules applied by section 529 of the Companies Act, 1956, notwithstanding the preferential payment scheme under section 530.
Analysis: Section 529 of the Companies Act, 1956 brings into winding-up proceedings the insolvency rules governing provable debts and the rights of creditors. By virtue of that incorporation, section 46 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 applies where there are mutual dealings between the company in liquidation and the creditor, requiring the account to be taken and only the balance to be recoverable. The preferential payment provisions in section 530 cannot override the effect of section 529 in relation to mutual dealings, and the two provisions must be read harmoniously so that a creditor proving a debt in liquidation is subject only to the balance found due on the mutual account.
Conclusion: The creditor was entitled to set-off, and the objection based on section 530 failed.