TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds decisions on share application money, emphasizing proof of identity and compliance.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Illac Investment P. Limited.</h3> Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Illac Investment P. Limited. - [2006] 287 ITR 135, 207 CTR 687 Issues:1. Addition of share application money to taxable income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Establishment of identity of share subscribers.3. Applicability of provisions of the Companies Act.4. Decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.1. Addition of Share Application Money:The judgment dealt with the case of an assessee who disclosed Rs. 4,75,000 as share application money for the assessment year 1989-90. The Assessing Officer added this amount to the taxable income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, citing lack of established subscriber identity. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) reversed this decision, holding that the assessee had satisfactorily proven the identity of the share subscribers.2. Establishment of Identity of Share Subscribers:Upon further appeal by the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal relied on previous court decisions and found that the assessee had indeed discharged the onus of proving subscriber identity. The Tribunal considered various factors, including provisions of the Companies Act, details provided by the assessee such as subscriber incorporation certificates, bank statements, assessment orders, and audited accounts. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's findings, emphasizing a proper appraisal of the material presented.3. Applicability of Companies Act Provisions:The Tribunal's decision took into account sections 72, 75, and 77 of the Companies Act, along with the details furnished by the assessee regarding the share subscribers. This comprehensive analysis of the Companies Act provisions, coupled with the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, played a crucial role in establishing the legitimacy of the share application money.4. Decision of Commissioner and Tribunal:The High Court, considering the concurrent findings of fact by the Commissioner and the Tribunal, concluded that no substantial question of law arose for their consideration in the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed based on the well-reasoned decisions of the lower authorities and the absence of any legal grounds warranting intervention by the High Court.In summary, the judgment addressed the addition of share application money to taxable income, the establishment of share subscriber identities, the relevance of Companies Act provisions, and the affirmations of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The legal analysis highlighted the importance of documentary evidence, previous court decisions, and a thorough examination of facts in determining the legitimacy of the disclosed share application money.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
