Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be taken on the strength of the original copy of invoices and whether the benefit of the cited circular and permission to use old stationery extended to the invoices involved.
Analysis: Modvat credit was claimed on original invoices instead of the duplicate or transporter's copy required under the applicable Central Excise Rules. The permission to continue using old stationery was shown to be limited upto 30-4-1994, whereas the invoices in question were issued later. The circular relied upon dealt with transitory provisions for registered dealers under a different scheme and did not apply to manufacturer-issued invoices in the present facts. The larger bench view that credit on invoices other than the prescribed duplicate copy is not permissible was treated as governing.
Conclusion: The Modvat credit was not admissible and the finding against the assessee was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the credit was claimed on improper invoices and the relied-upon circular did not extend relief on these facts.