TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds exemption for castings under Chapter Heading 7325.10, allows choice of beneficial exemption</h1> The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the Appellant's eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 202/88 and 223/88. The Tribunal ... Classification - Exemption Issues:1. Interpretation of Notification No. 202/88 and 223/88 for exemption eligibility.2. Classification of castings under specific headings for duty exemption.3. Application of legal precedent regarding the benefit of multiple notifications for exemption.4. Consideration of processing stages for classification under relevant chapters.5. Decision on the Revenue's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 122/90.Analysis:1. The appeal concerns the eligibility of the Appellant for exemption under Notification No. 202/88 and 223/88. The Revenue argues that the castings should be classified along with final machine parts under specific headings, making them ineligible for the claimed exemptions.2. The Respondent contends that the goods should be classified under 7325.15 due to the processing stage, entitling them to full exemption under Notification No. 202/88. Legal precedents, such as Jagatjit Cotton Textile Mills Ltd. v. CCE, support the right of the assessee to choose the more beneficial exemption when multiple notifications apply.3. The Tribunal notes that until proof machining, the castings are classified under Heading 73.25. The Circular No. 1/87 clarifies that certain operations do not change the essential character of the castings, supporting their classification under Chapter 73 for duty exemption.4. Under Notification No. 202/88, casting articles of iron under Chapter Heading 7325.10 are fully exempted. The Tribunal upholds the Respondent's choice of this notification over 223/88, as the law allows the assessee to select the more advantageous exemption.5. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismisses the Revenue's appeal, finding no merit in their arguments. The matter for the subsequent period is remanded to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise for further consideration, as no additional views are required at the current stage.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
