Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rubberised cotton cord fabric captively consumed in the manufacture of cycle tyres was marketable and therefore excisable, and whether the demand of duty, interest, and penalty could survive.
Analysis: The duty liability of an intermediate product depends on whether it answers the test of marketability as goods capable of being bought and sold. The burden to establish marketability lay on the Department. The show cause notice did not specifically allege marketability, and the evidence relied upon by the adjudicating authority was insufficient. The finding that the product had a shelf life of two days was unsupported by technical material, testing, expert evidence, or market enquiry. The product was also shown to depend upon the manufacturer's own trade secret formula, which weakened the claim that it was a commercially saleable commodity. Mere classification under a tariff heading did not establish excisability. In the absence of proof that the intermediate product had sufficient shelf life and was capable of being marketed, the Revenue failed to discharge its burden.
Conclusion: The product was not marketable and was not excisable as goods under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The duty demand was unsustainable, and no interest or penalty could survive.
Ratio Decidendi: An intermediate product captively consumed becomes dutiable only if the Revenue proves that it is marketable or capable of being marketed as goods; tariff classification by itself is insufficient.