Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an income-tax assessment, once final against the assessee, could be reopened or re-examined in liquidation or insolvency proceedings, and whether any interference was permissible in the absence of fraud.
Analysis: The assessment had become final because no appeal had been taken against it and it had been made under the statutory procedure applicable when the return was not filed and accounts were not produced. The Court held that a tax assessment stands on a different footing from an ordinary judgment debt, and that the insolvency court should not enlarge the scope of interference with a liability that has already been finally determined under the special income-tax machinery. The Court also accepted that interference in such a case would be justified only where the assessment is vitiated by fraud, and no such allegation existed here.
Conclusion: The assessment could not be reopened in the liquidation proceedings, and the claim of the Income-tax Officer remained payable.