Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the six-month limitation for refund under Section 11B commenced from the date of finalisation of provisional assessment or from the date of payment of duty under the amended explanation, and whether the amendment in sub-clause (e) of the explanation applied to a manufacturer.
Analysis: The limitation position before the amendment was that, in the case of provisional assessment, the relevant date for computing the refund period was the date of finalisation of the provisional assessment. The amendment introduced by sub-clause (e) of the explanation applied only to a person other than a manufacturer. Since the assessee was a registered manufacturer, that amended clause had no application to the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The amended explanation did not govern the assessee, and the reference application was unsustainable.