Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for reversal of Modvat credit under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the relevant price is the gross listed price or the net price actually charged after allowing trade discount.
Analysis: Rule 57CC(1) and Rule 57CC(8) require reversal with reference to the price charged by the manufacturer for the goods. The expression "price" was construed to mean the real consideration received from the buyer and not a gross catalogue price that is neither charged nor chargeable. Where trade discount is allowed and only net price is collected, the amount for computing 8% reversal must be the net price actually realised. The reasoning was supported by the principle that discount does not form part of the sale consideration, and by the persuasive analogy of the cited sales tax authorities and the Board's clarification relied upon in the order.
Conclusion: The relevant base for 8% reversal is the actual price charged after trade discount, not the gross listed price, and the assessee succeeds on this issue.