Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to partial waiver of pre-deposit in the stay proceedings and, if so, what amount should be deposited pending the appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned a stay petition under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 arising from a demand of duty and penalty against a transferee unit. The members considered the prima facie case, the contention that liability for the earlier period could not be fastened on the transferee, the plea regarding deemed Modvat credit, and the financial hardship shown by the appellants. The majority view accepted that the appellants had made out a sufficient prima facie case for substantial protection during appeal and fixed a limited pre-deposit amount, while keeping the balance stayed during pendency of the appeal on compliance. A dissenting view required a much higher pre-deposit, but the majority view prevailed.
Conclusion: The appellants were granted partial waiver of pre-deposit and were directed to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs, with the balance of duty and penalty stayed during the appeal on compliance.