Strict construction of import restrictions kept black insulating tapes outside the adhesive tape ban and quashed the customs order.

Import restrictions carrying penal consequences must be strictly construed, and customs authorities cannot extend a ban beyond the clear language of the control entry and its accompanying index. Black insulating tapes were treated separately from adhesive tapes in the applicable classification scheme, so they did not fall within the import ban. An order that disregarded the controlling index and failed to follow the earlier High Court ruling on the same classification issue was arbitrary and perverse, warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. The customs confiscation order was therefore quashed, and the writ petition succeeded with costs.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported black insulating tapes fell within the ban on adhesive tapes under the import control entry, and whether the customs confiscation order was liable to be quashed for being arbitrary and perverse in the face of the applicable index and the earlier High Court decision.

Analysis: The import control entry for electric insulations, read with its remarks and the accompanying index, treated adhesive tapes as a separate category from black insulating tapes. Restrictions on imports and penal consequences were required to be construed strictly, and if black insulating tapes were intended to be excluded, clear language would have been necessary. The index formed part of the controlling scheme and had to be given effect. The customs authority's refusal to follow the applicable High Court ruling on the same classification issue, without adequate reasons, rendered the order arbitrary and perverse, attracting interference under Article 226.

Conclusion: The black insulating tapes were not covered by the ban on adhesive tapes, and the confiscation order could not stand.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the impugned customs order was quashed with costs.

Ratio Decidendi: Import restrictions carrying penal consequences must be strictly construed, and where the controlling index and schedule treat two classes of goods separately, customs authorities cannot subsume one within the other by an expansive interpretation; an order contrary to the applicable legal classification and unreasonably disregarding binding judicial guidance is liable to be struck down in writ jurisdiction.

---