Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for clearances to the Guwahati region through depot sales, a lower assessable value based on regional market conditions and commercial considerations could be accepted under the excise valuation provisions.
Analysis: The assessee had maintained different declared prices for different regions and there was no allegation or evidence of extra consideration flowing back or of the Guwahati prices being sham. The regional price differential was supported by commercial factors such as competition, taxation, freight and market conditions. The decisions relied upon showed that where buyers in different regions or classes are treated differently for valid commercial reasons, more than one normal price may exist, provided the sale is in wholesale trade, the buyer is not a related person, and price is the sole consideration. The attempt to distinguish depot sales from direct factory gate sales was rejected, since depot sales were treated as an extension of the factory gate where no factory gate clearance for that region existed.
Conclusion: The lower assessable value for Guwahati depot sales was upheld and the demand based on the higher factory gate value did not survive.