Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court denies stay on payment pending appeal; petitioner to make installments; expedited appeal process.</h1> The High Court of Patna denied the petitioner's request to stay the payment pending appeal, as the petitioner had agreed to make installment payments. The ... When the attachment was made under section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 the petitioner itself undertook to deposit the amount in instalment and thereafter the attachment was recalled. Now the petitioner is making a prayer to stay the realisation of the amount till the disposal of the appeal. - petitioner cannot be allowed to blow hot and cold. Once it has undertaken to deposit the amount, it cannot take a different stand. In that view of the matter, the prayer for stay of realisation of the amount till the disposal of the appeal is rejected The High Court of Patna rejected the petitioner's request to stay the realization of the amount pending appeal, as the petitioner had already agreed to deposit the amount in installments. The appellate authority was directed to expedite the appeal process, ideally within two months.