Tariff classification of a synthetic tanning agent turns on actual chemical nature, not the manufacturer's description.

Vernatan R-7 was analysed as a condensation product of formaldehyde, amide and lignosulphonate, and therefore an amino-resin based synthetic tanning agent. Its tariff classification depended on its actual chemical nature and the scientific meaning of the entries, not the manufacturer's description. On that basis, the product fell under Item 15-A(1) as a condensation product or artificial resin, not under Item 15-AA as an organic surface-active agent or preparation. The exemption notification for surface-active agents also did not apply, because the product was not classifiable within that category.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Vernatan R-7 was classifiable under Item 15-AA as an organic surface-active agent or surface-active preparation, or under Item 15-A(1) as a condensation product/artificial resin; (ii) whether Notification No. 208/69-C.E. dated 27-8-1969 was applicable to the product.

Issue (i): Whether Vernatan R-7 was classifiable under Item 15-AA as an organic surface-active agent or surface-active preparation, or under Item 15-A(1) as a condensation product/artificial resin.

Analysis: The product was found on chemical testing to be a condensation product of formaldehyde, amide and lignosulphonate in powder form. Its manufacture, literature, and described use showed that it was an amino-resin based synthetic tanning agent, not a surface-active agent whose essential characteristic is surfactant or cleaning function. Classification was required to be determined by the actual chemical nature of the goods and the scientific meaning of the tariff entries, not by the manufacturer's description. On that basis, Item 15-A(1) covered the product and Item 15-AA did not.

Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Item 15-A(1) and not under Item 15-AA.

Issue (ii): Whether Notification No. 208/69-C.E. dated 27-8-1969 was applicable to the product.

Analysis: The exemption notification applied only to organic surface-active agents and surface-active preparations satisfying the prescribed surface-tension condition. Since the product was not classifiable as a surface-active agent or preparation, the notification could not apply.

Conclusion: The exemption notification was not applicable.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the departmental authorities was sustained and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the decisive test is the actual chemical nature and functional character of the goods, construed in technical and scientific terms, and not the label or description given by the manufacturer.

---