Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exhaust fan was eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, and whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether exhaust fans fell within Heading 84.14 of the CET and were covered by the capital goods provision, with only compressors under that heading excluded by the relevant explanation to Rule 57Q. On that basis, the balance of convenience was found to be in favour of the applicant for interim relief.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to waiver of the entire duty pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.