Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether emulsifiers were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 101/66-C.E. dated 17-6-1966 despite being described as organic surface-active agents.
Analysis: The notification expressly covered emulsifiers, wetting out agents, softeners and other like preparations, and did not require that such goods must themselves be surface-active preparations. The expression in the tariff heading for organic surface-active agents was held to be broader and capable of including emulsifiers, but that broader description did not take the goods outside the specific exemption granted by the notification. Since the products had already emerged from duty-paid organic surface-active agents and retained the characteristics of emulsifiers, the Revenue's objection was not accepted.
Conclusion: The exemption under the notification was held applicable to the products, and the Revenue's appeal failed.