Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Carton Sealing Machines used only for packing the finished shoes were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q covered machines, machinery, plant, equipment and similar items used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about any change in the substance for manufacture of final products. The disputed machines were used only for sealing cartons after the shoes had been manufactured and were not used in the production or processing of shoes themselves. Packing, even if relevant to marketability and treated as part of manufacture for other purposes, did not by itself bring such machines within the narrower definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q as it then stood.
Conclusion: Carton Sealing Machines used only for packing were not capital goods under Rule 57Q and Modvat credit was not admissible.
Ratio Decidendi: A machine used only for post-manufacture packing, and not for producing or processing the final product or changing its substance, does not qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q.