Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, when the assessee's books of account were accepted as genuine and the cash balance on the date of demonetisation was sufficient to cover the disputed high denomination notes, the assessee was bound to prove the source of each high denomination note presented for encashment.
Analysis: The cash balance shown in the books was accepted as genuine, and it was not disputed that the balance on the relevant date was sufficient to cover the notes later presented. In such a situation, the relevant enquiry was whether the income or receipt of money stood explained, not whether the assessee could prove the source of receipt of each high denomination note as such. A finding against the assessee could not rest on placing the onus on him to establish the source of the notes when the underlying cash balance had already been disclosed and accepted, and no tangible material showed the explanation to be false. Suspicion or conjecture could not substitute for legal evidence.
Conclusion: The assessee was not required, on these facts, to prove the source of receipt of the high denomination notes separately, and the Tribunal erred in holding otherwise.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, with the result that the disputed cash balance was held to include the 140 high denomination notes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee's books are accepted as genuine and the proved cash balance is sufficient to cover the value of subsequently demonetised notes, the burden does not shift to the assessee to prove the source of each such note; the department must establish, by legal evidence, that the explanation is false or that the amount represents undisclosed income.