Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty for the past six months could be demanded under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when the classification list had already been approved.
Analysis: The approved classification list governed the levy until its correctness was put in issue by a show cause notice. On the facts, the classification list had been approved by the proper officer, and the demand sought to treat the duty as a short levy notwithstanding that approval. In view of the governing principle that differential duty cannot be recovered as short levy on the basis of an approved classification list, the demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The demand for the past six months was not sustainable and the appeal succeeded.