Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was admissible on electric motor, power cable, current drive and uninterrupted power supply system as capital goods.
Analysis: The goods were used in the manufacture and processing of the final products and fell within the scope of Explanation 1 to Rule 57Q during the relevant period. Power cable was treated as part of the plant necessary for carrying on the business and not as a consumable item, and other electrical items were also held to qualify as capital goods under the rule. The earlier reasoning of the lower appellate authority was consistent with the broader interpretation of capital goods recognised in the applicable Tribunal decisions.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the disputed items as capital goods under Rule 57Q, and the Revenue's challenge failed.