Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of duty and penalty on the ground that duty-free inputs received under the DEEC customs exemption notification were used in the manufacture of final products and that the Board's circular supported the claim.
Analysis: The applicant manufactured the finished goods using a mix of duty-free and duty-paid inputs. The order noted that, in the Modvat scheme, there is no direct correlation between a particular input and the final product, and credit accumulated on duty-paid inputs may be utilised generally towards duty on final products. The circular of the Board was treated as reflecting the correct understanding of the scheme and as contemporaneous exposition. On that basis, the demand was not shown prima facie to justify insistence on pre-deposit, and even otherwise the demand appeared excessive to the extent it proceeded beyond the proportionate duty-free input element.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.