Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the appeal against the withdrawn order-in-original survived for adjudication; (ii) whether the subsequent adjudication order, passed after remand and fresh hearing, could be sustained.
Issue (i): whether the appeal against the withdrawn order-in-original survived for adjudication.
Analysis: The impugned order had already been withdrawn, and the appeal challenged that withdrawn order.
Conclusion: The appeal became infructuous and was dismissed.
Issue (ii): whether the subsequent adjudication order, passed after remand and fresh hearing, could be sustained.
Analysis: The later order purported to confirm an earlier order that had already been withdrawn, contrary to the direction for a fresh decision after personal hearing. It also failed to consider the impact of the clarificatory ruling in Ujagar Prints before disposing of the matter afresh.
Conclusion: The subsequent order was set aside in entirety and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after giving the parties an opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: One appeal failed as infructuous, while the remaining appeals succeeded to the extent that the adjudication order was annulled and the dispute sent back for reconsideration.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication order cannot validly confirm an order that has already been withdrawn, and where a matter is remitted for fresh decision, the authority must pass a reasoned order after hearing the parties and considering applicable binding law.