Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the question relating to availability of deemed Modvat credit on old and used broken aluminium and other machinery parts raised a referable question of law, or was confined to appreciation of facts and evidence.
Analysis: The reference applications arose from Tribunal orders concerning deemed credit under the Government order issued under Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules. The decisive condition was whether the goods were clearly recognisable as non-duty paid. The materials and documents had been produced, and the matter required verification, enquiry, and assessment of the surrounding facts. The determination whether the goods answered the description of being clearly recognisable as non-duty paid was therefore dependent on factual inquiry and appreciation of evidence, not on the formulation of any abstract legal principle.
Conclusion: The issue was held to be one of fact, no point of law arose, and the reference applications were rejected.