TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules Cable Conduit not machine part</h1> <h3>SUR HENNINGS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & C. EX., BANGALORE</h3> SUR HENNINGS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & C. EX., BANGALORE - 1999 (109) E.L.T. 203 (Tribunal) The appeal dealt with the classification of Cable Conduit under Tariff Headings 8466.93 and 83.07. The appellant argued that the conduit should be classified under 8466.93 as it is part of a machine tool, but the Tribunal found that since the conduit is imported in length and not formed into the required shape for the machine, it does not qualify as a part of the machine. The appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 