Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imposition of penalty of Rs. 500 was justified when the assessee, while availing small scale exemption and the benefit of Notification No. 111/78-C.E., crossed the prescribed clearance limit but did not apply for the required central excise licence.
Analysis: The assessee had admitted that its value of clearances exceeded 80% of the exemption limit and that it had not applied for the L-4 licence despite being required to do so. On these admitted facts, the appellate authority's view that the statutory conditions for availing the exemption and continuing without licence were not satisfied was found to be correct.
Conclusion: The penalty was held to be justified and the assessee's challenge failed.