Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether redemption fine could be waived on the footing that the imported goods were to be cleared only after mutilation, despite examination showing that a part of the consignment consisted of fully serviceable garments imported as premutilated rags.
Analysis: The goods had to be assessed in the condition in which they were imported. Once the consignment declared as completely premutilated rags was found to contain serviceable garments, that portion became offending goods. Their import was unauthorised because they were not eligible for clearance under OGL and the importer had no valid licence. Confiscation under the provisions governing improper import and misdeclaration followed as a logical consequence. The requirement of mutilation before clearance did not erase the offending character of the goods as imported, and redemption fine could still be imposed.
Conclusion: The waiver of redemption fine was unsustainable and the confiscation with fine and penalty was restored, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Imported goods must be judged for confiscation and redemption on the basis of their condition at the time of import, and subsequent mutilation does not nullify liability for confiscation, redemption fine, or penalty where the import is unauthorised or misdeclared.