Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        1998 (9) TMI 223 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Classification dispute over 'Indrox-985-P-12' under Central Excise Tariff Act The case involved the classification of the product 'Indrox-985-P-12' under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute centered on whether the ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                Classification dispute over "Indrox-985-P-12" under Central Excise Tariff Act

                                The case involved the classification of the product "Indrox-985-P-12" under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute centered on whether the product should be classified as a synthetic organic product used as a fluorescent brightening agent or a residuary product of the chemical industry. The Member (Judicial) upheld the classification under sub-heading 3204.30, based on the Chemical Examiner's report. However, the majority opinion, including the third Member (Technical), favored remanding the matter for de novo examination to the Commissioner of Central Excise.




                                Issues Involved:
                                1. Classification of the product "Indrox-985-P-12" under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
                                2. Determination of whether the product is a synthetic organic product used as a fluorescent brightening agent or a residuary product of the chemical industry.
                                3. Evaluation of the Chemical Examiner's report and its implications on the classification.
                                4. Consideration of technical literature and HSN notes in determining the correct classification.

                                Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                                1. Classification of the Product "Indrox-985-P-12":
                                The primary issue is the classification of "Indrox-985-P-12," a dye penetrant used to detect cracks or flaws in metal surfaces. The Revenue classified the product under sub-heading 3204.30 as a 'Synthetic organic product of a kind used as fluorescent brightening agent,' while the assessee sought classification under sub-heading 3823.00 as a 'residuary product of the chemical industry not elsewhere specified or included.'

                                2. Determination of Product Type:
                                The product is obtained by mixing aromatic solvents, fluorescent dye, and corrosion inhibitor, and is undisputedly a synthetic organic product. It is used to detect cracks on metal surfaces through a process involving cleaning, applying the dye penetrant, and then a developer to make the cracks visible. The Chemical Examiner's report described the product as a fluorescent yellow liquid composed of complex organic compounds and mineral oil with less than 70% mineral oil content.

                                3. Evaluation of the Chemical Examiner's Report:
                                The Assistant Collector classified the item under sub-heading 3204.29 as a preparation based on dyes, but the Collector (Appeals) upheld the classification under sub-heading 3204.30, stating it is used as a fluorescent brightening agent. The appellants contended that the product becomes fluorescent only after the addition of a developer, but this was not supported by any material evidence. The Chemical Examiner's report, which was not challenged, indicated that the product is fluorescent as it is.

                                4. Consideration of Technical Literature and HSN Notes:
                                The Member (Technical) noted that the Collector (Appeals) concluded that cracks are visible due to the dye's fluorescence without technical evidence supporting this. The adjudicating authority cannot substitute its opinion for expert opinion. The product's classification should consider technical literature, the character of the item, and HSN notes. The Member (Technical) proposed remanding the matter for de novo examination.

                                Separate Judgments:

                                Judgment by Member (Judicial):
                                The Member (Judicial) upheld the classification under sub-heading 3204.30, rejecting the appeal. The decision was based on the Chemical Examiner's report, which indicated that the product is a fluorescent yellow liquid without requiring a developer.

                                Judgment by Member (Technical):
                                The Member (Technical) disagreed, highlighting the lack of technical evidence supporting the conclusion that the product's fluorescence detects cracks. The matter was proposed to be remanded for de novo examination considering technical literature and HSN notes.

                                Majority Order:
                                The majority opinion, including the third Member (Technical), agreed with the Member (Technical) that the matter should be remanded to the Commissioner of Central Excise for de novo examination. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, requiring a thorough review of the product's classification in light of technical literature, the character of the item, and HSN notes.
                                Full Summary is available for active users!
                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found