TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Classification of 'Piling Rigs' under customs law upheld as parts for Pile Drivers</h1> <h3>LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS</h3> The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim for classification of 'Piling Rigs' under sub-heading 7308.90, upholding their classification under Heading ... Classification Issues Involved:1. Classification of 'Piling Rigs' under the appropriate chapter sub-heading.2. Applicability of Section 11A for confirming the demand up to the limit of 6 months.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of 'Piling Rigs':* Commissioner's View:- The Commissioner (Appeals) classified 'Piling Rigs' under chapter sub-heading 8431.00, attracting a duty of 20% ad valorem.- The Commissioner noted that 'Piling Rigs' are designed to be used solely or principally with Pile Drivers, which are classified under Heading 84.30.- The Commissioner referenced Explanatory Notes at page 1207 of the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN), which defines 'supports' as parts of conveyors, thus treating 'Piling Rigs' as parts of Pile Drivers.* Appellant's Argument:- The appellant argued that 'Piling Rigs' are structurals used as supports and not parts of the main machinery.- They contended that 'Piling Rigs' should be classified under sub-heading 7308.90 as they are in the nature of technical scaffolding used for laying foundations of multi-storey buildings.* Respondent's Argument:- The respondent maintained that 'Piling Rigs' are parts of Pile Drivers and should be classified under Heading 84.31.- They argued that 'Piling Rigs' work in conjunction with Pile Drivers and are essential for their operation.* Tribunal's Analysis:- The Tribunal examined the technical literature and definitions, including the definition of 'machine' from the book 'Theory of Machines' by P.L. Ballaney.- The Tribunal noted that 'Piling Rigs' function as part of the Pile Driver and are essential for its operation.- The Tribunal referenced the book 'Foundation Engineering' by C.A. Leonards, which describes 'Piling Rigs' as frameworks and platforms supporting the engine, boiler, and winches.- The Tribunal concluded that 'Piling Rigs' are not mere structures but function as integral parts of Pile Drivers, thus classifiable under Heading 84.31.* Conclusion on Classification:- The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim for classification under sub-heading 7308.90.- The Tribunal upheld the classification of 'Piling Rigs' under Heading 84.31 as parts suitable for use solely or principally with Pile Drivers.2. Applicability of Section 11A:* Commissioner's Discussion:- The Commissioner discussed the applicability of Section 11A for confirming the demand up to the limit of 6 months arising from the review application.* Tribunal's Conclusion:- The Tribunal did not find any merit in the appeal regarding the classification issue.- The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's view and rejected the appeal, thereby confirming the applicability of Section 11A as discussed by the Commissioner.Final Judgment:- The appeal was rejected, and the classification of 'Piling Rigs' under Heading 84.31 was upheld. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments and confirmed the Commissioner's decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
