Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount credited as retirement gratuity reserve was a reserve includible in the capital for computation of statutory deduction under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, or was excluded as a provision or current liability under the balance-sheet explanation.
Analysis: The amount was not a liability already accrued or a debt due in the accounting year; it was money kept back from profits for future use. A reserve may be specific as well as general, but it must represent sums appropriated out of profits and retained for future application. The explanation to the Second Schedule excluded items of the nature of current liabilities and provisions shown in the balance-sheet, but the disputed gratuity reserve did not answer that description because no current liability had arisen and the amount was not earmarked to meet a liability that had already accrued. The proper character of the item was therefore to be determined by its substance, not merely by the label used in the accounts.
Conclusion: The retirement gratuity reserve was a reserve and was includible in the capital computation under rule 1 of the Second Schedule. The answer to the reference was in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.