Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether special excise duty could be deducted while determining the assessable value under Notification No. 161/66; (ii) whether the extended period of limitation could be invoked for the demand.
Issue (i): Whether special excise duty could be deducted while determining the assessable value under Notification No. 161/66.
Analysis: The notification permitted deduction only of excise duty. In view of the governing principle that an exemption from duty of excise does not, by itself, extend to special excise duty unless the relevant statutory provisions are incorporated, the deduction claimed for special excise duty was not available.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the extended period of limitation could be invoked for the demand.
Analysis: The prior proceedings for the immediately preceding period had been dropped on the ground that the proviso to Section 11A could not be invoked. On that basis, the extended period was held not to be sustainable for the present demand.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The demand was upheld only to the extent of the normal limitation period, and the appeal succeeded in part.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification allowing deduction of excise duty does not automatically include special excise duty, and the extended period of limitation cannot be sustained where the basis for invoking it is not made out.