Synonymous commodity interpretation supports customs exemption for imported sucrose treated as refined sugar

Where imported sucrose was scientifically and commercially synonymous with refined sugar, it fell within the scope of the exemption notification for refined sugar under CTH 17.01. The relevant classification was read in light of recognised reference materials and the HSN explanatory notes, which supported treating sucrose as a form of sugar rather than a separate commodity. On that basis, exemption could not be denied merely because the notification used the term "refined sugar" instead of "sucrose"; the import was therefore treated as eligible for the notification benefit and consequential relief followed.

---

---

Issues: Whether sucrose imported as sucrose analar was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 103/94-Customs applicable to refined sugar of CTH 17.01.

Analysis: The exemption was claimed for refined sugar. The dispute turned on whether sucrose was a distinct commodity or merely another name for refined sugar. On the meaning drawn from recognised reference materials and the HSN explanatory notes, sucrose was treated as a form of sugar and not as a separate item outside the notification. Once sucrose and refined sugar were understood as synonymous in the relevant commercial and technical sense, the denial of exemption solely because the word "sucrose" did not appear in the notification could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The import of sucrose was held eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 103/94-Customs, and the denial of exemption was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the importer was granted the exemption benefit along with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the commodity imported is scientifically and commercially synonymous with the product covered by an exemption notification, the benefit cannot be denied merely because the notification uses a different but equivalent description.

---