Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's industrial undertaking was formed by the transfer to a new business of a building previously used in another business so as to be excluded from relief under section 15C(2)(i).
Analysis: The relief under section 15C was intended to encourage new industrial undertakings, but the conditions in section 15C(2)(i) had to be satisfied on the language used. The expression "transfer to a new business of building" was held to be wide enough to cover not only a transfer by the assessee of its own building, but also a case where a building previously used by another business was taken for the new undertaking. The term "transfer" was treated in its ordinary sense and was not confined to a transfer of full ownership. A lease or monthly tenancy was held to amount to a transfer of a right in the building, and the section did not require that the building be of a special kind or that ownership must pass.
Conclusion: The assessee's claim to relief under section 15C failed, because the new undertaking was formed using a building previously used in another business and taken on monthly tenancy, which fell within section 15C(2)(i).
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 15C(2)(i), "transfer to a new business of building" includes creation of a lease or monthly tenancy in respect of a building previously used in any other business, and is not confined to transfer of absolute ownership or to a building earlier used by the assessee itself.