Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unsaturated polyester resin and glass fibres used in lining and reinforcement of wash tanks were capital goods eligible for Modvat credit.
Analysis: The claimed goods were used for lining and periodic reinforcement of wash tanks and did not themselves constitute machine, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used in the production or processing of goods. The items were treated as materials used for repair and maintenance rather than capital goods forming part of the eligible manufacturing equipment.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was upheld and the appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The disputed materials were held not to qualify as capital goods for Modvat purposes, so the Revenue succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Materials used for lining or repair of plant and tanks do not become capital goods unless they themselves fall within the class of plant, machinery, equipment or similar items used in manufacture.