Income from undisclosed sources: documented hundi borrowings upheld as genuine loans after evidential appreciation, reversing addition to income

Evidence establishing lenders' identities, addresses and tax identity numbers carried probative weight and led to a factual finding that borrowings evidenced by hundis were genuine loans; the appreciation of oral and documentary evidence by the fact-finder was decisive and unchallenged by contrary evidence, with the consequence that such sums could not be treated as income from undisclosed sources. The determination was a pure finding of fact based on evaluation of evidence, precluding a legal interference with the conclusion and resulting in discharge with costs.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sums of Rs. 2,77,500 treated as income from undisclosed sources were in fact genuine hundi loans and therefore could not be added to the assessee's income.

Analysis: The assessee produced particulars of lenders, G.I.R. numbers, and documentary evidence showing payments and interest were made by crossed cheques through recognized banks; brokerage was paid by cheque and the broker's identity was disclosed. Summonses to the lenders and broker were served; the lenders did not personally appear but furnished confirmatory letters. Evidence recorded by the assessing officer behind the assessee's back was not made available for cross-examination. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner remanded for fresh assessment rather than deciding on the merits. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal examined the documentary and corroborative material and found it to be overwhelming and determinative on the facts, concluding there was no prima facie reason to doubt the genuineness of the loans.

Conclusion: The sums of Rs. 2,77,500 are held to be genuine hundi loans and not undisclosed income; the rule discharging the addition is allowed and the addition is set aside in favour of the assessee.

---