Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal overturns order, grants liberty to issue fresh show cause notice.</h1> The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the confirmation of duty being beyond the show cause notice. It allowed the commission paid to ... Demand - Show cause notice - Valuation Issues Involved:1. Confirmation of duty beyond the show cause notice.2. Commission paid to various distributors.3. Cost of secondary packing and cost of durable and returnable packing.4. Cash discount.5. Special discount.Detailed Analysis:1. Confirmation of Duty Beyond the Show Cause Notice:The appellants argued that the confirmation of duty by the original authority was beyond the scope of the show cause notice dated 28-2-1985, which only alleged the disallowance of certain deductions without demanding any duty. The Tribunal agreed with this plea, stating that no demand of duty can be made unless a show cause notice to that effect is given, as established by various Supreme Court judgments. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside on this ground alone, with the Revenue being given the liberty to issue a fresh show cause notice for the demand of duty.2. Commission Paid to Various Distributors:The appellants contended that the commission paid to distributors for orders they secured should be allowed as a deduction. However, they conceded that this commission is not permissible for orders secured on behalf of other dealers, based on the Supreme Court's judgment in the Coromandal Fertilisers case. The Tribunal agreed that if the distributors purchased the goods on a principal-to-principal basis, the trade discount permissible to dealers should also be available to such distributors, citing the Supreme Court's judgment in Seshasayee Paper & Boards Ltd. Therefore, the commission allowed to distributors for their own purchases was permitted, but not for orders procured from other dealers.3. Cost of Secondary Packing and Cost of Durable and Returnable Packing:The appellants argued that the cost of secondary packing, such as Hessian, Card Board Discs, and Paper Tubes, should be excluded from the assessable value, as it was primarily for protecting the goods during transportation. They also claimed that these packings were durable and returnable, which should further exclude their cost from the assessable value. However, the Tribunal found that the so-called special secondary packing had become the normal packing for wholesale market sales at the factory gate. Nevertheless, for distributors who purchased goods on their own account, the Tribunal allowed the exclusion of the cost of durable and returnable packing.4. Cash Discount:The appellants introduced a scheme for allowing a 2% cash discount if payment was made within a stipulated period. The lower authorities disallowed this claim, arguing that not all buyers availed of the discount. The Tribunal found this reasoning faulty, stating that cash discounts are inherently not given to all buyers but only to those who make prompt payments. The Tribunal allowed the cash discount that was actually passed on to customers, citing established legal principles.5. Special Discount:The appellants claimed special discounts were allowed in the invoices themselves for various reasons, such as old designs or excess production. The lower authorities disallowed this claim, arguing that there was no consistent policy for such discounts. The Tribunal, however, found that the nature and extent of the special discount were known at or prior to the removal of the goods, satisfying the Supreme Court's ruling. Therefore, the special discount claimed by the appellants was allowed.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the impugned order on the ground that the confirmation of duty was beyond the show cause notice. It allowed the commission paid to distributors for their own purchases, the cost of durable and returnable packing for such distributors, the cash discount actually passed on to customers, and the special discount claimed in the invoices. The Revenue was given the liberty to issue a fresh show cause notice for the demand of duty.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found