Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported carbide tipped circular cutters were classifiable under Heading 82.08 read with Heading 84.74 or whether the matter required remand for fresh factual examination of the machinery in which the cutters were fitted.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on the actual character of the machinery and the purpose for which the cutters were designed and used. The material on record did not satisfactorily establish the finished machine, its catalogue, or the manner in which the cutters were fitted and employed. Since the rival claims raised a factual controversy, the correct classification could not be finally determined on the existing record.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for de novo consideration after ascertaining the relevant facts and after observing principles of natural justice.