Classification of imported springs and applicable customs notification confirmed, with duty rate fixed under the correct notification.

Imported springs were treated as general purpose goods and classified under Tariff Heading 7320.90, with the lower appellate classification left undisturbed. For the effective customs duty, Notification No. 62/86 was held to govern, and the applicable rate was taken as 150% rather than the notification cited in the challenged order. The appellate challenge therefore failed on both classification and duty rate.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the imported springs were correctly classifiable under Tariff Heading 7320.90 as general purpose items; and (ii) which customs notification governed the effective rate of duty.

Issue (i): Whether the imported springs were correctly classifiable under Tariff Heading 7320.90 as general purpose items.

Analysis: The disputed goods were springs imported as part of a tape deck mechanism, but the appeal proceeded on the basis that springs were general purpose items. The Tribunal accepted the classification adopted by the lower appellate authority and found no merit in disturbing it.

Conclusion: The classification under Tariff Heading 7320.90 was upheld, against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Which customs notification governed the effective rate of duty.

Analysis: Both sides accepted that the correct effective rate of duty was 150%. The Tribunal also accepted that the relevant notification was Notification No. 62/86, and not Notification No. 86/86 dated 17.02.1986, as had been referred to in the order under challenge.

Conclusion: The applicable rate of duty was 150% under Notification No. 62/86.

Final Conclusion: The appellate challenge failed because the classification was affirmed and the duty rate was held to be 150% under the correct notification.

---