Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether edge trimmings and shots arising during the manufacture of ceramic wool and articles thereof were excisable goods chargeable to duty.
Analysis: The items in question arose only as waste during the course of manufacture and were not shown to have emerged as goods from a process of manufacture. In the absence of material establishing that they satisfied the test of marketability and the statutory requirement of manufacture, duty could not be levied merely because the waste was capable of being sold or recovered as scrap. The earlier view that such waste was not excisable goods was consistent with the binding principles governing levy of excise duty.
Conclusion: The edge trimmings and shots were not excisable goods and were not chargeable to duty; the department's demand was unsustainable.