1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Invalidates Subsidiary Gate Pass for Modvat Credit Due to Late Issuance</h1> The court held that subsidiary gate passes issued after 31-3-1994 were not valid for availing Modvat credit as per Notification No. 16/94-CE (NT), which ... Reference to High Court Issues: Validity of subsidiary gate passes for availing Modvat credit post 31-3-1994The judgment revolves around the issue of whether subsidiary gate passes issued after 31-3-1994 are valid documents for availing Modvat credit as per Notification No. 16/94-CE (NT), dated 30-3-1994, given that the subsidiary gate passes cease to be prescribed documents after 31-3-1994.The Commissioner, Central Excise, Chandigarh, raised the question of law regarding the validity of subsidiary gate passes for availing Modvat credit post 31-3-1994 based on a specific order of the Tribunal. The relevant notification, No. 16/94-CE (NT), dated 30-3-1994, prescribed documents for the purpose of Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It stated that the documents must have been issued before 1st April 1994 and the credit taken on or before 30th June 1994.The presiding Judge, Shri G.R. Sharma, analyzed the notification and noted that the subsidiary gate pass would be valid for Modvat credit only if issued before 1-4-1994. In this case, a subsidiary gate pass was issued on 8-4-1994, which did not meet the criteria set forth in the notification. Therefore, the Judge found that the subsidiary gate pass in question was not covered by the proviso to Notification No. 16/94-CE (NT), dated 30-3-1994.The Judge acknowledged a typographical error in the formulation of the question of law and corrected it to address subsidiary gate passes issued after 31-3-1994. He concluded that a point of law was indeed involved and directed the Registry to refer the question to the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court after preparing the statement of the case. Consequently, the reference application was allowed, indicating a decision in favor of the Commissioner, Central Excise, Chandigarh.In summary, the judgment clarifies the importance of adhering to the specific dates mentioned in notifications governing the validity of documents for availing Modvat credit under the Central Excise Rules. It underscores the significance of timely issuance and compliance with prescribed requirements to ensure eligibility for such credits.