Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Collector rules goods not cleared in contravention of Rule 56B. Revenue appeal rejected.</h1> The Collector ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the goods were not cleared in contravention of Rule 56B as the department had permitted the ... Semi-finished goods - Removal of The case involved the movement of bulk tea from one factory to another for further processing under Rule 56B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The jurisdictional authorities initially alleged duty evasion, but the Collector ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the goods were not cleared in contravention of the rule since the department had permitted the movement. The duty was paid by the consignee unit, so it could not be demanded from the consignor unit again. The appeal from the Revenue was rejected.