Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the letter dated 30-3-1977 could be treated as a valid refund claim or protest so as to save limitation.
Analysis: The letter expressly stated that it may be treated as registering the assessee's claim for rebate and also contained a specific claim for relief. No particular proforma for filing the refund claim had been prescribed during the relevant period. In such a situation, a protest letter can be construed as a refund claim when it clearly conveys the assessee's intention to seek the benefit claimed. The earlier rejection of the claim as time-barred was therefore not sustainable. Since the authorities had not examined the claim on merits, the matter required reconsideration by the jurisdictional Assistant Collector.
Conclusion: The letter was treated as a proper refund claim and the objection of limitation was rejected in favour of the assessee.