1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CEGAT Bombay rejects Revenue's refund application under Rule 173L, clarifies conditions for valid refund</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay rejected the Revenue's reference application regarding a refund sanctioned to the appellants under Rule 173L. The ... Refund The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay rejected the reference application by the Revenue regarding a refund sanctioned to the appellants under Rule 173L. The Tribunal held that all conditions prescribed in Rule 173L proviso were complied with, and the refund was in order. The Tribunal stated that the refund is limited to duty paid on re-processed goods, and since replacement was done before re-processing, the refund cannot be granted. The Tribunal found that the question raised had no revenue implication as reprocessed goods were cleared on payment of duty. The reference application was rejected.