Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order under section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended by the Finance Act, 1955, is an order of assessment to which the period of limitation prescribed under section 34(3) applies.
Analysis: The issue was concluded by the Supreme Court's pronouncement that an order made under section 23A directing payment of additional super-tax is not an order of assessment within section 34(3). On that basis, the limitation period applicable to assessment orders does not govern proceedings under section 23A as amended.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. An order under section 23A after its amendment by the Finance Act, 1955 is not subject to the limitation prescribed under section 34(3), and it can be made even after four years from the end of the assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: An order imposing additional super-tax under section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended, is not an assessment order and therefore is not governed by the limitation period applicable to assessments under section 34(3).